Supports
Security Fatigue
Brian Stanton, Mary F. Theofanos, Sandra Spickard Prettyman, Susanne Furman · IT Professional, 18(5), 2016
Key finding
Although the interviews never asked about fatigue, over half of the 40 participants described it: resignation, loss of control, fatalism, risk minimization and decision avoidance. This fatigue fed their sense that following security advice has little benefit.
Why it matters for PsySec
Documents the emotional cost of constant security demands, a key reason fear- and volume-heavy programs backfire.
Stance: Supports. Evidence consistent with a PsySec claim. Summaries are written by the database editors; read the original for full results and limitations.
Tags
Behaviors this study informs
Cite this study
APA
Stanton, B., Theofanos, M. F., Prettyman, S. S., & Furman, S. (2016). Security Fatigue. IT Professional, 18(5). https://doi.org/10.1109/MITP.2016.84
BibTeX
@article{stanton_2016_security_fatigue,
title = {Security Fatigue},
author = {Brian Stanton and Mary F. Theofanos and Sandra Spickard Prettyman and Susanne Furman},
year = {2016},
journal = {IT Professional, 18(5)},
doi = {10.1109/MITP.2016.84},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1109/MITP.2016.84}
}