Reports suspicious messages
Uses the reporting button or channel whenever a message feels wrong, whether or not they clicked.
Research / Behaviors
The specific things people and organizations do that PsySec says reduce manipulation risk. Each behavior links to the studies that support or challenge it.
Individual habits that help a person recognize, resist, and report manipulation. Codes start with PB.
Uses the reporting button or channel whenever a message feels wrong, whether or not they clicked.
Treats deadlines, threats, and 'act now' language as a signal to slow down, not speed up.
Confirms payment changes, credential requests, and odd asks by calling or messaging the person through a known, separate channel.
Stops when a message feels wrong, even before they can say exactly why.
Tells the security team right away after clicking a link, opening a file, or entering a password on a suspicious page.
Checks before acting when a message invokes a boss, executive, government body, or IT department.
Stays helpful, but confirms who is asking before sharing files, codes, or access.
Does not treat claims that coworkers already acted as a reason to act.
Holds to a few key routines (report, verify, pause) even when overloaded.
Tells teammates about attempted scams they spotted, in their own words.
Tells the security team when a rule blocks their work, instead of quietly building a workaround.
No longer relies on typos and bad grammar as the main warning sign.
Program and culture choices that make those habits likely. Codes start with OB.
Thanks the reporter quickly and tells them whether the message was real, and why.
Explains each Simulation to the whole audience afterward, instead of only showing a page to those who clicked.
Treats clicks as data about the Program, not as verdicts on people.
Uses reporting rate as the headline outcome and treats click rate as a diagnostic.
Scores each Simulation's difficulty (for example, with the NIST Phish Scale) and compares results only at similar difficulty.
Changes Simulation themes, formats, and timing so people keep paying attention.
Schedules reminders or short refreshers before awareness fades.
Keeps the effort that policies demand within what people can sustain alongside their real work.
Leaders model admitting errors and respond to self-reports with help, not blame.
Gives everyone a one-click report button and a triage process that can absorb a sudden flood of reports.
Pairs every warning with a clear, doable action people believe they can take.
Designs training that supports autonomy, competence, and belonging, and uses peers as messengers.
Invests in filtering and warnings first, and treats trained people as the layer that catches what gets through.
| Level | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Strong | Two or more field studies or trials point the same way. |
| Moderate | Consistent support from a mix of field, lab, and survey research. |
| Emerging | Early or indirect support; more research needed. |
| Contested | Credible studies disagree. |
Ratings are editorial judgments explained in the methodology.